There are a whole lot of sites out there that use the term “long term” in their domain title, but are they really futurist sort web sites? It is suggested usually by print publishers and editors that the term “potential” is a good word to use in titles, simply because it grabs people’s attention. But, when folks use the phrase foreseeable future and then do not give predictions or foreseeable future accounts, then are they genuinely deceiving the viewer and web-surfer. I feel they are.
Just lately, an editor of a long term of factors variety site requested me to write a column, but in reviewing the internet site I discovered it to be underwhelming on the futuristic side of issues, and more hefty into the scientific information arena. In fact, if the journal is significant about “The Potential” then why are all the articles or blog posts about new scientific improvements in the present period or occurring proper now? – asked myself.
Nigerian Online Newspaper appears like they are serious about scientific discovery that has currently transpired, not what will be in the potential. That is just uninteresting, more science news, regurgitation, common human tactic of re-packaging details. I feel they can do far better, but are holding them selves back, afraid to make men and women feel, anxious that you will get as well much from your mainstream, quote “main” group of viewers, which I believe they do not even understand.
Of training course, as an entrepreneur, I know just why they do it this way. It is because they want to make money and as a result sink to a lower level of readership, even though nonetheless pretending to speak about the future of stuff. When the editor wished to protect this kind of responses, the indication was that the website was primarily about scientific information.
Yes, I discover that the internet site is mostly a information web site and I request what does that have to do with the future of things? Shouldn’t the web site be called NSIN.com or one thing like that for New Science Innovation Information? If the internet site is about Science News and is a selection of absolutely everyone else’s information, then it is a duplicate web site of a style that is previously being employed and not unique. Hence, the content material is consequently the same, so even if the articles or blog posts are composed more plainly and less complicated to recognize, which is nice, still what is the benefit to a “science information junky” as there are extremely number of content articles on the site in comparison with their competitors?
If they named them selves a news web site, then you could have “futurist kind columnists” in any case, who may possibly project these scientific news products into the potential or they could preserve the “Long term Things” motif and advertise the futurist columnists.
This must be a lesson to all “Futuristic” sort internet sites as a case examine. If you take the long term thinkers to your site and have absolutely nothing to present them, they will go away. If you use trickery to get typical audience there, you are carrying out a significant disservice to the future of mankind, by advertising existing inventions as the be all stop all. Both way, it is unethical to use this tactic on potential of things sort internet sites.